When I tell people that I've recently started a fashion blog, there seem to be a few stock
reactions. One of which is the super supportive, super encouraging , super
friend response of 'That's great!' - and to all y'all who did that, I send you
virtual cuddles coz you da best. Another standard reaction making itself
apparent however, is the quizzical head tilt, the 'don't you think that's a bit
clichéd?' side look. The look that comes before the question, 'Isn't that a bit
girly..?'. What I should really do to these people is get all Catherine Tate up
in their grills and say, 'Am I bovvered?', but the honest answer to that question
would be YES, Catherine - I kinda am. And it's got me wondering why. What is
there to be bovvered about? I am a girl, so what's my beef with my blog being
deemed girly or overtly feminine? I've been thinking about it, and I believe my
issue here is that I don't see fashion (and therefore a blog about fashion) as
feminine - or at least not in the sense implied through that pointed
tilt-of-head.
I suppose it all boils down to how we define femininity, so
I'm going to hand over to the Oxford English dictionary for a moment:
feminine
Line breaks: fem¦in|ine
ADJECTIVE
1. Having qualities or
an appearance traditionally associated with women, especially delicacy and
prettiness:
'the snowdrops gave a feminine touch to
the table'
And here's my
problemo: I, a female, don't always identify with this archaic concept of femininity.
You see, I don't want to be delicate
or pretty; what I want is to be bold and bad-ass - and the way I attempt that is
through fashion (with questionable success fo sho, but that's the way with creative
endeavours). Fashion isn't 'traditional', it's about constant reinvention. It's adventurous and daring - paradoxically, attributes linked to our equally archaic idea of masculinity.
I think this is a
good time to draw your attention to Exhibit A: brand consultant, Michelle
Harper at NY fashion week, A/W14
Image via The Cut
Despite the fact
that she's wearing a skirt, has her hair did, and is flashing her boobies (i.e.
if there was a 'girly' checklist, there'd be ticks all round), if I had to give
one gendered comment, it would be, 'This
chick's got balls'. Because, let's face it, you've gotta be brave to bare your nips in February and to still look so cool (no pun intended) and unfazed.
And then we have
Exhibit B: Yves Saint Laurent's classic 1966 smoking jacket - revolutionising
women's fashion for good. (And if you haven't seen Jalil Lespert's YSL movie,
do. DO IT NOW. Or soon, anyway.)
Image via sfgate.com
Almost the opposite of Harper, the
model is dressed like a man, yet oozes womanly appeal. And it's at this moment where I want to
high-five fashion, it can be just so darn clever. Fashion is a medium which
allows individuals to take a concept we think we know and, like some out of
this world break-dancer, flip it on its head and spin it around a few times.
And that's what's happening here. Nearly 50 years apart, fashion is enabling
people to take an idea of femininity which is old-fashioned and unrealistic, and
turn it into something new, bold and bad-ass. Something that reflects an idea
of femininity that I don't just identify with, but I aspire to.
So don't
dismiss the fashionistas. Don't shrug them off as typical, shoe-loving girly girls.
Don't think of them as fashion victims. Sure, some of their looks may fall flat.
They might live to rethink that drop-crotch jumpsuit. They might suddenly
realise that fluffy handbag looks like a dead badger. Or they might look back and think 'I looked fucking awesome'. But it doesn't really matter what they, I, or
you think of the clothes - that's not the point. The point is, these women are gutsily
triumphing over outdated notions of femininity and using fashion, the thing
which led to them being labelled too girly in the first place, to do it. How cool
is that. Fashion victim? Fashion victor, more like.
In short, don't give me
funny looks about my fashion blog. Alright?
Vaguely,
Elizabeth x
Interesting post xx
ReplyDeletehttp://reallyliteral.blogspot.com/
Thanks, Christina! x
DeleteLove this post!! Great stuff!
Deletewww.lovelywanderlust.com
@WanderLustGirls
So glad you enjoyed it, Emily!
DeleteI love the voice behind your words! You're so funny!!! Haha congrats on being chosen for the weekly roundup.
ReplyDeletehttp://adornedinarmor.com
You sweetie, thank you so much! Just read your Politics of Fashion article - really interesting and refreshingly honest.
DeleteLove this post ! Its so true, like when people ask what I like to do I hesitate myself for a moment before telling me I have a fashion blog because I know the reaction ill get ! But theres so many different types of aspiring people and their blogs and people should stop stereotyping ! >_< but still I am overly girly myself!
ReplyDeletexoxo
couturecrush.net
Rei
Thanks for your comment Rei! You're right, there are so many inspirational bloggers out there that it seems almost ridiculous that there is often a negative reaction to blogging. But I just want to clarify that there's absolutely nothing wrong with being girly. What I have beef with however, is that 'girly' can be used as a bad word, almost as an insult. It's unhelpful and rooted in a deeply sexist construct - and THAT's what pees me off!
Deletexx
GOOD STYFF! well written and insightful.This is what Fashion Blogger should be about.. Digging past the "STANDARD" view of fashion blogging and talking about the off beat topics. lets have a limelight on the different style of bloggers!!! great job love
ReplyDeletewww.tallglassofstyle.com
Thank you for your kind words, lovely! x
DeleteThis is awesome! I love how bold you are. Fashion is for everybody!
ReplyDeleteXOXO
Kierra
http://aprettythought.org/
Damn right it is! Thanks for reading x
Delete